Posted by
dieneces on Monday, September 29, 2008 7:51:16 PM
Though the answer may be obvious, it is far from representative of conservatism. Indeed, both of the reasons are our recent and current standard-bearers. In the case of Pres. Bush, this was clear from the moment he used the words 'compassionate conservatism' in his 2000 campaign. Indeed, I doubt anyone could have imagined how 'compassionate' he was going to be with other people's money.
Similarly, the question on economic literacy was answered years ago for Mccain as well. Recall Pres. Bush first pushing his tax-cuts: Mccain referred to them as 'class warfare'. Since then, he's tried to reposition himself as a true conservative in this respect. Unfortunately, his true beliefs come out when he is even slightly off-script - and sometimes when he's 'on-script'...
Ofcourse, some may argue that his record on spending supports his free-market credentials. That's probably true. But, he hasn't ever given a coherent account of how government spending causes loss of capital, inflation, debt, devaluation of currency, and crowding-out. If hasn't ever, then it plausible than he can't or even that doesn't really believe in truly free markets. If either of these possibilities are true, he simply won't be able to muster both the courage and gumption necessary to say 'no'. Indeed, saying 'no' to so many industries, people, and institutions which are used to quasi-socialism requires a person with true conviction. Not only will Mccain fail as conservative leader in tough times, he won't be able to convince the electorate why we can't afford Sen. Obama.